Neither Oedipus nor Hamlet was the direct cause of his troubles. :: essays research papers

Although you may never advert them, and although you may not tread the soil of Gods grand earth at the same time, many believe it to be a scientific fact every one of us has a twin. These populate believe that in some modal value, we are all connected as twins. Upon presenting their theory, these individuals must turn in been confronted with hitches and hurdles. From chuckling and chortling to snickering and sneering, one can only imagine the result these scientists must have receivedUpon hearing the stories of Oedipus and settlement, our eighth period English class reacted much like the scientists audience. We began with a prince by the name of Hamlet. The quote, with capacious power, comes great responsibility comes to mind.As a scholar, Hamlet questioned and analyzed everything situated before him. It was no surprise that when presented with the murder of his sustain, Hamlet acted with extreme caution. He knew it was his duty to avenge his fathers murder, both as a prin ce, and as a son. In no way could he have prepared himself for such an arduous task. This is why I believe Hamlet was a victim of his circumstance. Hamlet did not provoke the murderer of his father nor influence the course of events that spurred such shocking circumstances however, being analytical, his outmatch quality, made it more difficult to reach his goal.In the same way, Prince Oedipus is confront with an indubitable fate. From childhood, this young prince was cursed, but destiny never gave up. Again, having such eager love for his father, Oedipus did the unthinkable- he gave up everything he had ever known to fork out the life of the man whom he thought to be his father. Once again, it was the protagonists beat out quality that made him vulnerable to his circumstances. Oedipus never sought to mistreat, much little murder his father, but fate would have it no other way. both(prenominal) of these protagonists have many difference and similarities. Their differences range from motive to the method, which they reacted to their circumstances.Oedipus doesnt violent death to avenge anyone he kills well because some men were in his way? Whereas Hamlet kills to seek justice for an indiscretion committed against he and his family- the honor, which define his name. Hamlet fought for a father he knew a father whom he had shared new experiences and memories with. This was not a life Oedipus was familiar with, that is with his receive father.